---
F R E N D Z  of martian
---
Apparently it isn't just Britain that are at it.

But then, it isn't about borders any more. It's about bankers.

As far as I can see, the governments of the world are just managers for the
global banking 'conspiracy'. Although the CIA just appears to be a dissident
cell working on its own...

--
Martin Cosgrave
Appdev Ltd - http://appdev.co.uk
0117 902 3143
----- Original Message -----
From: Niels Provos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 3:59 PM
Subject: GeeK: Declan McCullagh: Planned Net-treaty limits privacy, may
compel key disclosure


> Weeh. This is awful.
>
> ------- Forwarded Message
> Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 09:09:43 -0400
> From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Planned Net-treaty limits privacy, may compel key disclosure
>
> The document:
> http://www.politechbot.com/docs/treaty.html
>
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,36047,00.html
>
>     Cyber-treaty Goes Too Far?
>     by Declan McCullagh ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>     3:00 a.m. May. 3, 2000 PDT
>     WASHINGTON -- U.S. and European police agencies will receive new
>     powers to investigate and prosecute computer crimes, according to a
>     preliminary draft of a treaty being circulated among over 40 nations.
>
>     The Council of Europe's 65KB proposal is designed to aid police in
>     investigations of online miscreants in cases where attacks or
>     intrusions cross national borders.
>
>     But the details of the "Draft Convention on Cybercrime" worry U.S.
>     civil libertarians. They warn that the plan would violate longstanding
>     privacy rights and grant the government far too much power.
>
>     The proposal, which is expected to be finalized by December 2000 and
>     appears to be the first computer crime treaty, would:
>
>      * Make it a crime to create, download, or post on a website any
>      computer program that is "designed or adapted" primarily to gain
>      access to a computer system without permission. Also banned is
>      software designed to interfere with the "functioning of a computer
>      system" by deleting or altering data.
>
>      * Allow authorities to order someone to reveal his or her passphrase
>      for an encryption key. According to a recent survey, only Singapore
>      and Malaysia have enacted such a requirement into law, and experts
say
>      that in the United States it could run afoul of constitutional
>      protections against self-incrimination.
>
>      * Internationalize a U.S. law that makes it a crime to possess even
>      digital images that "appear" to represent children's genitals or
>      children engaged in sexual conduct. Linking to such a site also would
>      be a crime.
>
>      * Require websites and Internet providers to collect information
about
>      their users, a rule that would potentially limit anonymous remailers.
>
>     [...]
>
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology
> To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
> This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>
>
>


--
Sent to you via the frendz list at marsbard.com

The archive is at http://www.mail-archive.com/frendz@marsbard.com/

Reply via email to