Marcus G. Daniels wrote: > But we can improve/disprove models for the consequences of global > warming and its causes. There are measurable things.. Put another way, we've done the perturbation experiment where we pour massive amounts of extra CO2 in the atmosphere. We can try other experiments, like, as Dyson suggests, inventing new ways to make lots of biomass or reducing the artificial CO2 or both. Then the climate models can be checked as the input parameters will have changed in ways that can at least be estimated. Yes, I realize there is a problem of the error bars on these experiments, but in principle it is possible, unlike with prayer!
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
