Note, of course, that he directly defines the possible number of sub-groups in 
a network as its 'utility' or as in the first line of the link defining that, 
the 'hapiness' of the net! 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Owen Densmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:00:12 
To:The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: [FRIAM] Reed's law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Interesting to see that David Reed's Law is now in Wikipedia:
   <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed's_law>
Its all about beyond Metcalf's value of the network being n^2,  
bringing in the power set of subgroups networks can form, thus  
valuing the network as 2^n.

Stephen has the insight that Reed's Law is quite important and  
explains the web 2.0 explosion and a will be a/the major component of  
a web 3.0 future.

Nice to see its now pretty fully on the radar.

     -- Owen



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to