Hey Pete,

That's definitely an interesting extrapolation from that Make article.
I love stuff like that.  Thanks.

But can you help me reduce my ignorance?  Which "complexity science
geniuses" created these credit models?  And which ones do you think
might go to jail?

-glen

Thus spake peter circa 09/30/2008 11:06 AM:
> http://www.make-digital.com/make/vol15/?pg=173
> 
> Here is a beautiful article by George Dyson that is truly one of the
> clearest examples of the current problems with complexity theory
> especially its relationship to economics , what it is trying to do and
> what it actually did with the mess created on wall street it should make
> every every CTO and CEO sit up and shudder.
> 
> Basically the credit models created by complexity science geniuses, that
> are the foundation of most high flying arbitrage financial houses,
> created there own version of  reality that had very little relevance to
> the real world.  These same geniuses made enormous amounts of money by
> designing this fake world and convincing there neophyte non tech masters
> they should be paid millions for its discovery conveniently forgetting
> that its roots were firmly built in fiction  Someone shouts the Emperor
> has no clothes and presto the whole house comes tumbling down
> 
> The FBI is also apparently digging into this cesspool so expect to see a
> large number of these bright software phds entering federal prison in
> the not to distant future
> 
> It also has relevance to the scary statement by Janet Wing at the
> institute when she said that future computer models need not be grounded
> in reality but could create there own.
> 
> Think also on the connection that not only are these complex models non
> verifiable but so are most databases and agent modeling systems. Without
> easy verifiability I would submit they are worse than
> useless
> 
> As Dyson points out the tally sticks " stocks" that where used in the
> 13th century are far superior to the billions of dollars of hardware and
> software used today. A stick " Stock " lived in the real world and was
> verifiable at the lowest level of inspection. Sadly today our complex
> system have proved to be totally non verifiable with the associated
> collapse of trust.
> 
> Its also a stark example to our 1st mile friends about the higher
> relevance of what goes into the pipe rather than the pipe itself and why
> hi speed verification of what is happening in the real world is so much
> more important
> 
> The quicker we realize that the raison d'etre of the digital world is to
> improve the quality of life and include some moral directives in our
> work based in reality the more we will be able to sleep at night


-- 
glen e. p. ropella, 971-219-3846, http://tempusdictum.com


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to