Orlando Leibovitz wrote: > Of course, the Supreme Court (the name now sounds surrealistic) has > prohibited the following suggestion citing a violation of free speech > but here it is anyway.
Ah, therein lies the beauty of my suggestion. By limiting contributions to registered voters, I've eliminated corporate and union backers from contributing (their members may do so). This should get past the Supremes because no-one not a voter can show a compelling interest in the race. Effectively, anyone not a voter in a particular race would have no standing to sue. Free speech is preserved for those who should have it - and denied to those without standing. -- Ray Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Consilient Heuristician Voice:505-844-4024 ATA Department Mobile:505-238-9359 http://www.sandia.gov/scada Fax:505-844-9641 http://www.sandia.gov/idart Pager:800-690-5288 ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
