That strikes me a bit "self"-ish, Owen. ;-}
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm a bit disappointed in their not getting rid of some of the real ugly > things in python. Especially not using lexical scoping, and requiring > "self" all over the place in variable references. Yes, I want the "self" > object reference, but not for instance and class variables. > > -- Owen > > > > On Dec 11, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Robert Holmes wrote: > > I thought about it but this Python release is not backwards-compatible and >> I've got a LOT of v2.5 code. And the migration process (see the bottom of >> http://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html) is not exactly simple... >> >> R >> >> P.S. Plus I don't want to recompile numpy and pylab and scipy and... >> >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Just curious: how many of us have tried python 3.0? >> http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.0/ >> .. I ask because a book I'm looking at for teaching python to youngsters >> jumps right into 3.0: >> http://www.briggs.net.nz/log/writing/snake-wrangling-for-kids/ >> >> -- Owen >> > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org > -- Doug Roberts, RTI International [email protected] [email protected] 505-455-7333 - Office 505-670-8195 - Cell
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
