Sorry for the confusion. it's sailor talk, a "lift" is an impulse in the
direction you're trying to go.

-- rec --

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Nicholas Thompson <
nickthomp...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>  Cyclists want lift??!!  How do they maintain contact with the road?
>
> N
>
>  Nicholas S. Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
> Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
> http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Roger Critchlow <r...@elf.org>
> *To: *nickthomp...@earthlink.net;The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
> Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
> *Sent:* 11/25/2009 10:26:08 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] flocking windmills
>
> No, the pelaton uses the lead rider to break a bow wave through the air,
> but the eddies from each rider's passage also curl around to give some lift
> to the subsequent riders in the pelaton.  If you smoothed it out into one
> long cylinder, it wouldn't work as well.
>
> The vertical wind turbines work as a flock because they induce a sort
> of do-si-do of the wind through the flock, where each rank of turbines is
> positioned to catch the eddy from the preceding rank and throw it back to
> the next rank.  Because the wind takes a longer than straight path through
> the flock, it has to move faster than the unimpeded wind.  If you just set
> up a stonehenge in the same arrangement as the flock of turbines, you'd get
> the same sort of velocity effect.
>
> Having the flock adjust its geometry could be a big win.  A fixed
> installation would be tuned to the most likely wind speed and direction.
>
> -- rec --
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Nicholas Thompson <
> nickthomp...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>  Hugh,
>>
>> Thanks for explaining this to me.  I figured it was something like that.
>>
>> But the logic IS backwards with respect to the bike racer model.  The Bike
>> racer pod is trying to protect the lead racer from wind resistance, the wind
>> mills are trying to pass that resistance through to ever member of the pod.
>>
>> We could shrink-wrap the bike-pod, and it would do its job even better.
>> Not so the windmill pod.
>>
>> Right?
>>
>> N
>>
>>  Nicholas S. Thompson
>> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
>> Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
>> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>> http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Hugh Trenchard <htrench...@shaw.ca>
>>  *To: *The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group<friam@redfish.com>
>> ;nickthomp...@earthlink.net;Carl Tollander <c...@plektyx.com>
>> *Cc: *fr...@redfish.com
>>   *Sent:* 11/25/2009 7:15:27 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] flocking windmills
>>
>>
>> ...that should read "rotate the position of the fans 90 degrees" (it was
>> late and I should have been in bed).
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Hugh Trenchard <htrench...@shaw.ca>
>> *To:* nickthomp...@earthlink.net ; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
>> Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> ; Carl Tollander <c...@plektyx.com>
>> *Cc:* Friam@redfish.com
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:05 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] flocking windmills
>>
>>
>> It looks to me the article addresses this.  When windmills are in a
>> conventional "face to the wind" position, they do need to be well spread out
>> in order to catch as much wind as possible.  But if you rotate the position
>> 90 of the fans degrees so that they are spinning "sideways", they spin with
>> greater efficiency when lined up behind each other in zones of lower air
>> resistance.  The article appears to refer to this fan position as a
>> "vertical" rotation.  The photo shows "vertically" rotating tube like
>> structures, which are much like long fans turned on their sides.  Aligning
>> them in fish school formation evidently is the most efficient in terms of
>> space and maximal wattage generation.  That's how it all appears to me in
>> any event.
>>
>> Hugh Trenchard
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Nicholas Thompson <nickthomp...@earthlink.net>
>> *To:* Carl Tollander <c...@plektyx.com>
>> *Cc:* Friam@redfish.com
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:45 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] flocking windmills
>>
>>  Sorry, everybody.  What I meant to write was, "*Wait *a blithering
>> moment!!!", suggesting,  at least,  that the metaphor between bunching up
>> cyclists and bunching up windturbines was backwards.  Don't you WANT your
>> turbines to "feel" the "headwind"?
>>
>>  Of course I am wrong about this, but I sure would like to understand why.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>  Nicholas S. Thompson
>> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
>> Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
>> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>> http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Carl Tollander <c...@plektyx.com>
>> *To: *nickthomp...@earthlink.net;The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
>> Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
>> *Sent:* 11/24/2009 10:13:22 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] flocking windmills
>>
>> What they lack is mobility - lacking some sort of mobile platform maybe
>> they could get together and decide where the next best placement would be
>> and tell the manufacturing and installation people.   Some sort of
>> distributed instantiation - Group orders another member, turbine shows up in
>> the mail, speaks up, says, "I am a wind turbine, the group has determined
>> that it will be most efficient if you place me over there." And the humans
>> would go do that, since the turbine family was usually right about such
>> things.
>>
>> So maybe the turbines "want" some particular configuration, the friction
>> is just one criteria.   If they were a phased array antenna (in addition to
>> being a group of wind turbines) then they would have additional criteria.
>>
>> C
>>
>> Nicholas Thompson wrote:
>>
>>  Now what a blithering moment.  Cyclists flock to reduce friction.  Ditto
>> fish, I suppose.
>>
>> So, turbines want less friction with the wind?????
>>
>> Something screwy here.
>>
>> N
>>
>>  Nicholas S. Thompson
>> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
>> Clark University (nthomp...@clarku.edu)
>> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/<http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturaldesigns/>
>> http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Roger Critchlow <r...@elf.org>
>> *To: *The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group<friam@redfish.com>
>> *Sent:* 11/24/2009 7:36:30 PM
>> *Subject:* [FRIAM] flocking windmills
>>
>> Same power production as existing wind farms in 100th the land area.
>>
>>   http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2009/1124/1
>>
>> -- rec --
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to