Well, look... the original ranter is clearly right about some things and
wrong about others.

IF you wanted to really gain the minimal cost-per-mile on a cross country
drive in an electric car, it would take you a ridiculously long time to get
across the country. Also, the amount of time it takes to hit the tradeoff
in cost between electric and gas (higher up-front costs vs. cheaper mileage
cost) is way longer than most people think.

That said, the car isn't optimized for cross-country drives, it is
optimized for modal driving habits, i.e., daily commute and errands, parked
overnight. Further, as many have pointed out, electric and hybrid personal
vehicles are still at the tail edge of tehir "early adopter" phase. Thus,
it would be unsurprising to find that many people are making the purchase
"because they want it", even if it is not a superior dollar-for-value
investment.

Eric



-----------
Eric P. Charles, Ph.D.
Lab Manager
Center for Teaching, Research, and Learning
American University, Hurst Hall Room 203A
4400 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
phone: (202) 885-3867   fax: (202) 885-1190
email: [email protected]


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Gillian Densmore <[email protected]>wrote:

> The volt offers a house current level charger as well as a more industrial
> one. As does Tesla, and the EV. He didn't say wich one he was using, that'd
> impact his recharging time.  I'm wondering why a solar charger isn't
> offered as well.
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Gillian Densmore 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Energy production cost is a pipeline issue. The NIMBI's: Breeder
>> reactors, recycling rods, Hybrid Fusion/Fision--or on the more extreme
>> scale Matter-Anti-Matter.Are slightly cheerper. (reduced bucks per KW)
>> Though do have there own issues.Somewhere in the middle are ways to
>> leverage the big ass rock covered in gasses eletical properties.
>>  PopularScience,Nature, and I think Popular Mechanic have (and had) a
>> re-accuring test run of inductive chargers that you can put on some
>> electric cars.
>> I don't understand the science entirely, the article I'm thinking of had
>> one with with what looked like antenas on it. such that when the car was
>> idle for some period of time the baked in recharing mechanics would kick,
>> but somehow- these dooddads would get just enough more particles from
>> someplace to extend it's range a bit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Marcus G. Daniels 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 13:16 -0600, Steve Smith wrote:
>>> > I'm a member of an EV group in Northern NM and I find the discussions
>>> > about EV viability always to be pretty much religious ones.
>>>
>>> When one consciously spends more to advance the market for progressive
>>> technology, it is annoying when cretins lie about the facts of the
>>> matter.  So yes, sit him down in front of a nice tail pipe, and tie him
>>> to the bumper too.  Useless.
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ============================================================
>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to