I choose to evolve forever without limits, asking for and accepting help from within and without -- information, evidence, role models, guidance, feedback, support, direction, intuition, inspiration, revelation, transformation, miracles, union -- allowing healing forgiveness and release of all confusions in my own mind -- serving the highest benefit of each and all...
We are each uniquely evolving facets of all of entire single evolving creative spontaneous open fractal hyperinfinity... I accept all of your spontaneous power -- I let you all the way in... John A. McDougall MD drmcdougall.com fresh organic low-fat, low-protein, high complex starches and colored vegetables, low-sugar -- I have no caffeine or cocoa or alcohol -- no medicines at all, 500 mg V-C daily... also, ForksOverKnives.com Woodrow C. Monte, PhD WhileScienceSleeps.com avoid all methanol, which in humans only is made by ADH1 enzyme into uncontrolled formaldehyde inside cells of 20 tissues -- wood peat and cigarette smoke, aspartame, dark wines and liquors, fresh tomatoes, unfresh fruits juices vegetables, cut up, heated, preserved wet at room temperature in sealed cans jars plastics... 142 mg methanol weekly is provided by 6.5 cans aspartame diet drink, about 1 can daily, the amount used by 161 moms, whose kids became autistic, over twice the methanol taken by 550 moms who had no autistic kids. dietary methanol and autism, Ralph G. Walton, Woodrow C. Monte, in press, Medical Hypotheses (now peer reviewed), free full rich text, 38 references: Rich Murray 2015.07.06 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2015/07/dietary-methanol-and-autism-ralph-g.html neurobehavioral effects of aspartame, GN Lindseth et al 2014, funded by Army, free full plain text -- 25% of 28 healthy young university students had obvious harm from a dose same as 9 cans daily for just 8 days: Rich Murray 2015.07.05 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2015/07/neurobehavioral-effects-of-aspartame-gn.html Table 5.2 is the key chart -- ADH1 enzyme at high levels in 20 tissues in body and fetus makes methanol into formaldehyde right inside cells, initiating over 20 human diseases, with full text references, WC Monte paradigm: Rich Murray 2013.03.21 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2013/03/table-52-is-key-chart-adh1-enzyme-at.html "As a matter of course, every soul citizen of Earth has a priority to quickly find and positively share evidence for healthy and safe food, drink, environment, and society." within the fellowship of service, Rich Murray, MA Boston University Graduate School 1967 psychology, BS MIT 1964 history and physics, 1039 Emory Street, Imperial Beach, CA 91932 rmfor...@gmail.com 505-819-7388 cell 619-623-3468 home http://rmforall.blogspot.com https://www.facebook.com/rmforall https://www.facebook.com/rmforallmethanol https://www.linkedin.com/pub/rich-murray/30/835/652 https://about.me/richmurray rich.murray11 free Skype audio, video chat On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:05 PM, glen <geprope...@gmail.com> wrote: On 10/28/2015 02:24 PM, Nick Thompson wrote: > >> >> [NST==>Well, remember Glen. I am a rank Deweyan. I think that people can >> and ought to discuss and argue, decide, and act concertedly. One thing >> that >> stands in the way of that is the notion that I can’t “do anything about >> climate change.” I mean isn’t politics just the aggregation of individual >> opinion in the service of concerted group action? <==nst] >> > > Yes, but while we have some control over how we are integrated, as an > individual, we have little/no control over how the whole aggregates ... > more importantly, we have little/no knowledge of the implications of the > aggregate. Blind action is no better than nefarious nor worse than > virtuous action. > > [NST==>Ok, you are >> forcing me to own up to my basic question. Why do people who disagree >> with >> one another bother to talk? What is the good in that? I assume it’s >> because we are striving for the non-zero-sum gains of concerted action. >> Also, there is some evidence, I gather, that involving more than one >> person >> in a decision actually improves the quality of the decision. <==nst] >> > > Well, my opinion isn't very useful, here. I tend to think we talk > _mostly_ as a replacement for grooming each other. Or perhaps I should > phrase it as: most of the talk we engage in is meaningless jabber that > replaces grooming. But perhaps each of us, all of us, does engage in some > sort of reprogramming, at least sporadically and rarely. > > The best I can do is tell you why _I_ talk (including these tl;dr > e-mails). It is in the hopes that I will be reprogrammed. Every word I > read, every noise I hear, wherever it comes from, whomever it comes from, > _might_ reprogram me. There are other ways to be programmed (working in > the garden, driving, hiking, etc.). But there is a kind of nuance to > talk-talk-based reprogramming that is difficult to get at any other way. > > -- > ⇔ glen > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
