Ha! You win that round hands down. On June 16, 2017 11:56:13 AM PDT, Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com> wrote: >Glen writes: > >"The authentically intelligent and well intentioned become tools for >the gamers/defectors. In the end, it's that _faith_ in human nature, >social or evolutionary progress, or whatever that allows them to be >used that way." > >Another possibility is that many gamers are impatient and are not that >useful for long term efforts like interplanetary colonization. (I >think it was Musk doing the gaming.) It seems to me the trick is to >figure out what the counterparty is. If it is a gamer, then game them >back but don't get invested. If it is not a gamer, then the >interaction is more complex, and a pure gamer will have to learn how to >mimic a non-gamer (learn domain expertise) or else they'll exhaust >their memory of the transactions. In reality, people aren't just one >or the other. One can have purpose, but also can play a "long con" >from time to time. > >Marcus >============================================================ >FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv >Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College >to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com >FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
-- ⛧glen⛧ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove