If you, as a non-dualist, allow for tentative action, why not allow for tentative belief?
On 09/21/2017 02:20 PM, Nick Thompson wrote: > Peirce defined belief as that upon which we act and doubt as the absence of > belief. It follows logically that anything we act on affirms some belief > and, therefore, at the moment of action, extinguishes all contrary beliefs. > If you follow me here, I may appear to win the argument, but only on > sophistic points. -- ☣ gⅼеɳ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
