Yes, I understand your skepticism. I even share it. But nothing you've said 
validates the dichotomy you laid out before. The wizard's spell sense you get 
from entanglement across 3 meters of space is a reflection of how you (yes, and 
most of us) model the world. Even if it's only like 5/7e9 people that have any 
intuition of how the other model(s) work(s), it's still not zero. And I suspect 
it's more than 5.

A pedestrian example is in how/why/what the kids love about Instagram and hate 
about Facebook ... or can listen to that gawdawful music they listen to. 
They're developing intuitions us old farts will never have. What's to say it 
won't also happen with QM effects? E.g. we're already (fairly) comfortable with 
the way transistors work, even if most of the modeling language in which 
they're used is classical. The distinction between the circuits-level language 
of use versus the underlying quantum properties of materials level language of 
transistor construction (again riffing off Eric's point) isn't near as crisp as 
it once was.

That optimism does rely on a progressive society, though ... which looks 
unlikely at this point.

On 4/30/19 4:34 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> There are more people that catch fly balls than develop theories of physical 
> information.   I don't believe a well-funded liberal culture will change 
> that.   Maybe in a hundred or a thousand years if we are a reconfigurable 
> species, a large part of the population will spend their days experiencing 
> and manipulating physical phenomenon as first class thing using an extended 
> nervous system.  But as it is, the inputs are from a narrow range of 
> temperatures & pressures and a tiny window of electromagnetic radiation.   
> And cognitively, the short term workspace of a human is small and slow 
> compared to even a simple computer.   

-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to