Frank,

 

Oh, I don’t mean THAT kind of sleep.  

 

I just mean that, if my head is full of shitty thoughts about the future, 
telling myself that I am not going to wake up is actually calming.  

 

It’s an instance of Thompson’s First Law:  

 

Thou shalt not worry about two mutually exclusive calamities.

 

I developed this law when I found myself sitting on my sunny front porch in New 
Braintree worrying, alternately, that the young elm tree growing near the porch 
would grow up and cast shade on the porch AND that the young elm tree growing 
near the porch would die of dutch elm disease.  

 

I figured that if I had nothing better to do with my mind, I should probably 
take a nap. 

 

Nick 

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

 <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> thompnicks...@gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <thompnicks...@gmail.com 
<mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Hi, Y’all, 

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two 
sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert 
discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could 
be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an 
exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next 
six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and 
practically, to prepare ourselves for it.  

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so 
paradoxical: 

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a 
clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.” 

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day:  

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to 
plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be 
regarded as legitimate by the general public. 

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question:  

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one 
hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey 
that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop.  

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into 
bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But 
conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of 
the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we 
can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion: 

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the 
consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our 
institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, 
etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed? 
 Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, 
which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will 
mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in 
their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed. 

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

thompnicks...@gmail.com <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> 

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> > On 
Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com> 
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to