Russ,
I have not had time to follow this thread, but just want to remind you what my first response to your question would be. Intentions are not the sorts of thing we “have”. They are things that we do. They are of a higher order than knee jerks, or even apple bites, but they are patterns in behavior all the same. I have busy because I signed up to do all sorts of things in September because I had nothing to do, and to my horror and surprise, every thing I signed up for, bore fruit and now I am overwhelmed. I have a prejudice against Dennett. I think he worries too much about his standing with the Big Kids at Harvard and trying NOT to violate vernacular ways of thinking so much as to dent his royalties. And I am jealous of him. So there. Hope you are well Nick Nicholas Thompson Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology Clark University <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/ From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Russ Abbott Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 12:07 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Dennett on agency Not sure what the point is. Larger systems can exploit information and "pick of scars." Cells in that sense are larger systems. I'm confused about what that is supposed to add to the discussion. Computer programs can certainly be described using intentional language. Does that mean that a computer program can have intention? If so, that seems to degrade the notion of intent. -- Russ Abbott Professor, Computer Science California State University, Los Angeles On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:23 AM jon zingale <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: ... and why tornados fail to have it. A key feature appears to be that agents have a history that makes a difference, can exploit information the way a thermostat can. Electrons or molecular motors, for instance, don't pick up scratches or scars. Sean Carroll adds that agents participate in the arrow of time. Queued up to the relevant part of the discussion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yZw4wxvnVQ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yZw4wxvnVQ&ab_channel=SeanCarroll&t=1670s> &ab_channel=SeanCarroll&t=1670s -- Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
