And to make matters worse, we won't be able to trust the Census 2020 data *either* because they're cutting it off early:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/us/supreme-court-census.html All models are always wrong. Applying the population divisor, which is a wrong model, over the top of your wrong model (cases) produces an even more wrong, wrong model. But false models atop false models sure is USEFUL. Which brings me to a post I thought about making last week: ad hominem *as* critical thinking. I may find the time to make that post if I'm lucky. On 11/2/20 11:46 AM, Tom Johnson wrote: > Nick: > I would suggest that the 2010 population data is pretty thin for analysis. > Off the top of my head, our 87505 ZIP has about 25k people as of 2019. ZIP > 87507 has about 50k. Hence the crying need for an appropriate denominator > when looking at cases by ZIP. -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
