One idea would be to convert organizations like the CDC into organizations that 
function under federated state control, or are even autonomous corporations 
that just accept federal funding.    Organizations like the Helmholtz 
Association or Fraunhofer come to mind.  PBS, USPS, too.    Create a situation 
where one crazy executive just doesn't have the authority to stop essential 
functions.   Make the state not only deep but distributed, and having more 
complex membranes.  

In the spirit the best defense is a good offense, I still think it makes sense 
to take as many Trump people off the board as possible.  Bury them in 
indictments, at least.  It may be that political coordination at the federal 
level isn't really needed to do this, and that the Biden administration can 
keep up appearances as a unifying force.

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 8:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Where are you Gary Kasparov?

I can't name people. AOC seems to have that capability. But she's too high 
profile. What you're looking for are people who are good at, happy with, and 
perhaps even proud of being cogs in a machine, even if they're more like a 
universal belt than a localized cog. Elizabeth Warren seems like a dork. But 
that she ran for President at all makes me wonder if she's an authentic dork.

And, anyway, I'm worried that looking for the solutions in *people* instead of 
institutions simply encourages the gaming, encourages attempts to collapse the 
diversity and "win". I think what we need are delegates from pools like these:

https://constitutioncenter.org/debate/special-projects/constitution-drafting-project
https://reason.com/volokh/

... people who seem to target the core principle of balanced power. Although 
the Volokh group is starkly libertarian, their saving grace seems to be a 
fairly strong commitment against partisan hegemony, against a collapse in 
diversity, against cults of personality.

I suppose if I had to choose a single fairly high profile person, I'd pick 
James Mattis. Yeah, he's a bit of a hawk. But my guess is he would understand 
both sides of the "bold moves" blade.

On 1/6/21 5:06 AM, David Eric Smith wrote:
> So let’s suppose Georgia goes through the way it is looking likely to do.
> 
> The Ds have two years.  In addition to the overwhelming bulk of practical 
> work that needs doing, which they can now keep McConnel from blocking out 
> entirely as an act of sabotage, they have one other equally urgent priority: 
> to put up firewalls against the next round of fascist cheating.
> 
> We can see what the Rs are doing: they are taking measurements.  Venezuela 
> was a good model, and they know it.  Also the Philippines under Marcos and 
> then post-Aquino.  It doesn’t matter what is written in the law if you can 
> fill the political offices with people who refuse to follow it, and the legal 
> offices with others who refuse to enforce it.  So the Rs are taking stock of 
> who they need to replace to get to that threshold locally in 2022, and 
> country-wide for 2024.  It’s all Darwinian.  The people in these offices 
> don’t fundamentally change.  If you are trying to build up corruption, you 
> sieve the society to find corrupt people to fill positions.  Then they will 
> go on being who they are.
> 
> This is the time I want to find somebody whose strategic and tactical sense 
> is what I have as an image of Kasparov.  Yes, hardness in place is needed to 
> defend positions under attack.  But one needs to understand when it is time 
> to move, and to do it on the necessary scale.  There is no winning chess play 
> that consists only of defense.  Such people can be difficult.  They are not 
> always the right people for every moment, and too much boldness carries 
> risks.  But for the times when boldness is the only path to good play, we 
> need to elevate the ones who know how to do it.
> 
> Who are those in the US political arena right now?


--
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to