Ha! Sure. ... it still looks like SteveS called it with the Red Queen's Race. Even if such tech solves more problems than it creates, it'll still be distributed according to the power structures in place (e.g. rich people) when the tech's ready to scale.
On 4/19/21 7:54 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > Again technology to the rescue... Nanotechnology for desalinization. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ??? > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 7:45 AM > To: friam@redfish.com > Subject: [FRIAM] water, again (was murder offsets) > > Copper? Natural gas? Pffft! Water's the interesting one. > > https://theconversation.com/interstate-water-wars-are-heating-up-along-with-the-climate-159092 > > And another one: > https://www.theolympian.com/news/business/article250595449.html > > On 4/15/21 7:59 AM, uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ wrote: >> Another good example is water rights across states given watersheds, >> flood irrigation, etc. >> <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/05/arizona-water-one-per >> centers> >> >> So, the question you're asking (how might "storage" in BTC be less >> preferable to other assets?) isn't really answerable *without* first >> discussing what that reservoir is *for*, what end does it serve? -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
