Sometime around twenty years ago I was approached by a company that was a spinoff of Kaiser-Permanente. They have access to decades of medical records about millions of patients. Their goal was to determine how much of medical advice given to patients is evidence-based versus traditional rule-based responses to patient symptoms and complaints. Their preliminary analysis was that about 25% was evidence-based. I asked my primary care provider what he thought and he wasn't surprised.
--- Frank C. Wimberly 140 Calle Ojo Feliz, Santa Fe, NM 87505 505 670-9918 Santa Fe, NM On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 4:52 PM Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com> wrote: > By that definition most of medicine is bullshit. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ??? > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 3:27 PM > To: friam@redfish.com > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Natures_Queer_Performativity_the_authori.pdf > > > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306068036_Psychiatry_as_Bullshit > > On 4/29/21 3:21 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote: > > Jon, > > > > I am sorry I disappointed you. My understanding of object relations > theory is like swiss cheese and I chose not to provide an inadequate > response by humming a few bars. By the way, object-relations theory > provides a non-Oedipal alternative to your interpretation as explained by > the Wikipedia article. I became the withholding bad object to you. I hope > you will be able to integrate that with the good object I have been at > times. > > > > Good for Glen. > > > > I am not a practitioner of psychoanalytic theory but it may not be for > you. As for psychoanalytic /treatment, /see the last paragraph of the > Wikipedia article. > > > > Warmly, > > > > Frank > > > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 4:09 PM jon zingale <jonzing...@gmail.com > <mailto:jonzing...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Frank, > > > > To some extent, your response is indicative of the psychoanalytic > > ends I criticize, the mommy-daddy-me Oedipal construction. Rather > than > > pick up on the opportunity presented by the conversation to engage > in an > > act of creativity (contributing to a forum), you use your agency to > make > > an authoritative (daddy) appeal to an object away from yourself and > your > > agency (the Wikipedia article). This action strikes me as > functionally > > different than Glen's earlier reference, say. While Glen's appeal > acts to > > ground and facilitate a living discussion, yours aims to end one. I > felt > > that the question I asked was fair, to hum a few bars regarding a > > connection you are making that perhaps could contribute. If this > sort of > > short-circuiting of concepts and conversation is what I can expect > from > > practitioners of psychoanalytic theory, well, maybe it's not for me. > > > -- > ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ > > - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ > archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ > - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam > un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ > archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ >
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/