Prof Dave West,

There is something different happening with the current generation of AI
compared to the previous generation. The AI generation of Alan Newell @
Herb Simon, and I also want to include Big Blue that beat Gary Kasparov at
chess was just encoding human intelligence and making it much faster. The
AI did not contribute any novel concepts to the algorithm, the humans did
that.

The current neural network based AI does add novelty to the solution. It
learns and gains insight from the data in ways that humans can not.

Take AlphaFold for example, humans do not understand how to predict the
folding of a protein by analyzing the amino acid sequence; it's beyond
human understanding to do that. It's like AlphaFold looked at the 100000
odd known examples of amino acid sequences and the resulting folded protein
structure and say - it's easy, you just look at this, then that, and the
resulting folded protein is this. Even comprehending what AlphFold is
saying is beyond human understanding - it's there to look at, it's in the
weights of the gain and biases of the many connections of the artificial
neural network, but humans can just not interpret it.

For a human to understand AlphaFold's reasoning to solve the protein
folding problem is like expecting a 2 year old child to understand quantum
mechanics. Or like me to understand my wife's mind.

AI does not have general intelligence, maybe it will never happen. But I
think it's safe to say that in some narrow fields, like in the protein
folding problem, AI is certainly more intelligent than humans. The
important issue is that there is evidence that AI does add novelty to the
solution.

Pieter



On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 22:46, Prof David West <profw...@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> Thirty something years ago, Alan Newell walked into his classroom and
> announced, "over Christmas break, Herb Simon and I created an artificial
> intelligence." He was referring to the program Bacon, which fed with the
> same dataset as the human deduced the same set of "laws." It even deduced a
> couple of minor ones that Bacon missed (or, at least, did not publish).
>
> Simon and Newell tried to publish a paper with Bacon as author, but were
> rejected.
>
> AlphaFold (which I think is based on a program Google announced but has
> yet to publish in a "proper" journal) is, to me, akin to Bacon, in that it
> is not "doing science," but is merely a tool that resolves a very specific
> scientific problem and the use of that tool will facilitate humans who
> actually do the science.
>
> I will change my mind when the journals of record publish a paper authored
> by AlphaFold (or kin) as author and that paper at least posits a credible
> theory or partial theory that transcends "here is the fold of the xyz
> sequence to address why that fold is 'necessary' or 'useful'.
>
> davew
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021, at 1:12 PM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
>
> A year or so ago, Deepmind's AlphGo defeated the then world Go-champion
> Lee Sedol at a time when leading Ai researchers predicted it will be at
> least 10 years before AI can reach that level. But the valid question then
> was - why so excited? It's just a game. There is an interesting documentary
> on youtube about this at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXuK6gekU1Y
>
> What's happening now is that AI makes scientific discoveries beyond human
> ability.
>
> Is anybody worried where it will end?
>
> I quote from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2
> Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
> Proteins are essential to life, and understanding their structure can
> facilitate a mechanistic understanding of their function. Through an
> enormous experimental effort1–4, the structures of around 100,000 unique
> proteins have been determined5, but this represents a small fraction of the
> billions of known protein sequences6,7. Structural coverage is bottlenecked
> by the months to years of painstaking effort required to determine a single
> protein structure. Accurate computational approaches are needed to address
> this gap and to enable large-scale structural bioinformatics. Predicting
> the 3-D structure that a protein will adopt based solely on its amino acid
> sequence, the structure prediction component of the ‘protein folding
> problem’8, has been an important open research problem for more than 50
> years9. Despite recent progress10–14, existing methods fall far short of
> atomic accuracy, especially when no homologous structure is available. Here
> we provide the first computational method that can regularly predict
> protein structures with atomic accuracy even where no similar structure is
> known. We validated an entirely redesigned version of our neural
> network-based model, AlphaFold, in the challenging 14th Critical Assessment
> of protein Structure Prediction (CASP14)15, demonstrating accuracy
> competitive with experiment in a majority of cases and greatly
> outperforming other methods. Underpinning the latest version of AlphaFold
> is a novel machine learning approach that incorporates physical and
> biological knowledge about protein structure, leveraging multi-sequence
> alignments, into the design of the deep learning algorithm.
>
>
>
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to