Fine, the goal is some composition of functions and it is all interdependent.
Sure.  Of course.  Why is this so profound to y’all?

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of thompnicks...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 10:20 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] gen'fur

Which takes us back to thermostats, intentionality, intensional inexistence, 
Sober’s epiphomenator, spandrels, and Lorenz’s law: The goal is never the 
function.  If you build a bird that measures competing male robins in terms of 
“brown stick with red fluff” you eventually get an ethologist who gets that 
bird to attack by providing only brown sticks with red fluff.

See.  It’s all connected.

Nick

Nick Thompson
thompnicks...@gmail.com<mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On 
Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 12:30 PM
To: friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] gen'fur


Sometimes all you need is a good aphorism

https://sketchplanations.com/goodharts-law

or maybe boost it up with a cartoon

https://sketchplanations.com/

I can't help but wonder if there's an analog of Goodhart's law lurking, here.





On September 9, 2021 2:31:39 PM PDT, Marcus Daniels 
<mar...@snoutfarm.com><mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com> wrote:

Or they are reprogramming their people to be smarter!

(Actually, deCODE is owned by Amgen now.)



Selection is already occurring, so it isn't as if this is some sci-fi thing.



https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/12/the-last-children-of-down-syndrome/616928/

-----Original Message-----

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com><mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> On 
Behalf Of David Eric Smith

Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 2:12 PM

To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
<friam@redfish.com><mailto:friam@redfish.com>

Subject: Re: [FRIAM] gen'fur



Aha!  This is why Iceland has the highest per-capita fraction of published 
authors in the world.  I had assumed it was the weather….



On Sep 10, 2021, at 2:17 AM, Marcus Daniels 
<mar...@snoutfarm.com><mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com> wrote:



That can be screened as well with a large population-wide survey such has been 
done in the UK or Iceland.

Of course, it is unlikely that complex behaviors will be governed by isolated 
mutations, so the task is to look for highly predictive motifs (e.g. regular 
expressions).



-----Original Message-----

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com><mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> On 
Behalf Of u?l? ?>$

Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 10:12 AM

To: friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com>

Subject: Re: [FRIAM] gen'fur



Ha! Now you're trolling. The answer is: "because the sites that generate 
reading ability (or whatever) *also* generate other 'abilities'", with 
"abilities" in scare quotes because many abilities are considered bad ... like 
the ability of a pimply faced white dude to shoot up a church or blow up a 
federal building.



In addition to polyphenism, there's robustness. If more than 1 site generates 
the same functional ability (reading), then do we write them all? ... just one 
of them? ... a probabilistically predictive handful of them?



On 9/9/21 10:00 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:

So find the sites that correspond to reading ability, or whatever, and WRITE 
them.



-----Original Message-----

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com><mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> On 
Behalf Of u?l? ?>$

Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 9:51 AM

To: friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com>

Subject: Re: [FRIAM] gen'fur



I was alerted to this article this morning:



Can Progressives Be Convinced That Genetics Matters?

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/09/13/can-progressives-be-con

v

inced-that-genetics-matters



It should delight those amongst us who rant about the "woke". 8^D But it 
dovetails nicely with the fraught concept of equality in the other thread.



Coincidentally, also on 9/6, the BIAPT announced their early career prize 
winner Emily McTernan:

https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.associationfo

rpoliticalthought.ac.uk%2fbiapt-2021-early-care&c=E,1,Je9MVNdO8lpJQOd

6fZwUNe-4z5yuFq0upxNIzMBFjmLFh_h5a63ueVVpd8lkEdWeUx5Xx1RaoPg3T5Ph8YlG

0558qqHLZD8-DKeBPEC3YYM,&typo=1

er-prize-winner-dr-emily-mcternan/



"In her forthcoming monograph, Dr McTernan develops her work on social equality 
further, to advance a pioneering conceptual account – and robust normative 
defence – of the phenomenon of ‘taking offence’. Therein, McTernan contends, we 
should understand taking offence, under appropriate conditions, as a civic 
virtue rather than a vice, as an emotion that embodies the resistance of social 
inequalities within a community."





On 9/8/21 8:06 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:

From about a cancer rate of 10% (without mutation) to 50% (with) but it depends 
on the BRCA variant.



https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/disease/breast_ovarian_cancer/breast_ca

n

c

er.htm

<https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/disease/breast_ovarian_cancer/breast_c<https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/disease/breast_ovarian_cancer/breast_cancer.htm>

a<https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/disease/breast_ovarian_cancer/breast_cancer.htm>

n<https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/disease/breast_ovarian_cancer/breast_cancer.htm>

cer.htm><https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/disease/breast_ovarian_cancer/breast_cancer.htm>



On Sep 8, 2021, at 4:07 PM, Frank Wimberly 
<wimber...@gmail.com><mailto:wimber...@gmail.com> wrote:





Is the Braca gene that little correlated with breast cancer?



---

Frank C. Wimberly

140 Calle Ojo Feliz,

Santa Fe, NM 87505



505 670-9918

Santa Fe, NM



On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 4:57 PM Marcus Daniels 
<mar...@snoutfarm.com<mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com> 
<mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com><mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com>> wrote:



   Yeah, it is hard to get excited about “unusual” variance. Modern

classification algorithms like gradient boosting make it possible

to predict phenotypes, and to me that is a lot more interesting

(and still possible to deconstruct).____



   __ __



   *From:* Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> 
<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com><mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> *On 
Behalf Of *Eric Charles

   *Sent:* Wednesday, September 8, 2021 3:53 PM

   *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
<friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com> 
<mailto:friam@redfish.com><mailto:friam@redfish.com>>

   *Subject:* [FRIAM] gen'fur____



   __ __



   Gen'fur this, gen'fur that... and also the realities of biological 
complexity....

   ____




- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to