I'm guessing "primordial" carries the foundationalist urge, whereas "primeval" is more agnostic to foundations, but targets sequence. So the test for hypothesis is simply *if* Webb finds no evidence of small black holes, then the they can't account for dark matter. Right? Or is there something more subtle about it? ... mabye something "distributional"?
Black holes and dark matter — are they one and the same? https://news.yale.edu/2021/12/16/black-holes-and-dark-matter-are-they-one-and-same Webb’s Quest for Primeval Black Holes https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/26/webbs-quest-for-primeval-black-holes/ And maybe tangentially, Astronomers identify likely location of medium-sized black holes https://phys.org/news/2022-04-astronomers-medium-sized-black-holes.html P.S. July 12th: First Images of the James Webb Space Telescope (Official NASA Broadcast) https://youtu.be/nmMRMIE3MGw -- ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/