AI, Teaching, and "Our Willingness to Give Bullshit a Pass"
https://dailynous.com/2023/01/05/ai-teaching-and-our-willingness-to-give-bullshit-a-pass/

The first time I heard this argument was from these guys:

https://www.audible.com/pd/Pill-Pod-104-AI-the-New-Crisis-of-Humanities-Education-Podcast/B0BPQ77Z8P

My phrasing of the idea being that tools like ChatGPT are analogous to calculators, allowing the computer to do what it's good at and freeing humans up to do what we're good at. Why require students to learn bullshit rhetorical styling when we can teach them to think about the *substance* ... a lesson many of us learned from Knuth's TeX a long time ago. The trick is that tools like ChatGPT are built around the bullshit-generation use case. What we need are tools built around the bullshit-detection use case.

and is the introduction of GPTZero (and it's ilk) represent closing the loop in an "antagonistic" pair to hone that BS generator even faster?

With branch prediction, we could implant a little device just under the eardrum that listened to someone's speech acts for a tiny fraction, predict where it was going, and call bullshit or "pay attention" for some interval. The bullshitters' rhetoric would never even reach your audio perception devices. ... like trigger warnings for all of us sensitive snowflakes who can't bear to look on images of Mohammed <https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2023/01/05/hamline-university-assailed-for-firing-professor-who-showed-images-of-muhammads-face/>.

With a nod to our resident trans/post-humanist(s), our perceptual circuits *already* select for what they have been trained to see/hear/smell/taste/feel some things more/better/easier/differently than others.  So jacking that up with pass-through AR technology is totally "obvious"... and therefore a "good idea"?


Those of us who've kissed the Blarney Stone, unfortunately, would spend our lives talking to brick walls.

But with things developing as they are, the brick walls would be capable of a much more interesting dialogue, perhaps, than people (though given nay will be post/trans-humans, WTF?).   A wall of (otherwise) bricked smart-devices programmed just to be contrarian with your syntax and logic constructions?

I think this is probably where we are headed:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/With_Folded_Hands
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to