On 6/27/25 12:11 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:

Do you people use acronyms to appear more esoteric?  Stop it!
Legend:

   FWIW == For What it is Worth

   QWAN == Christopher Alexander's Quality Without a Name

   EAC == Enactivism / Autopoiesis / Dependent Co-Arising (in
   bottom-posted definitions)

   LLM == Large Language Model

   M&V == Maturana & Varela (in reference to their Autopoesis)

   DaveW == David West

   EricS == David Eric Smith

hope I got them all


---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, 10:06 AM steve smith <[email protected]> wrote:

    FWIW I composed one of my arbitrarily long (and convoluted)
    observations (maybe just mansplaining) about the multiple uses of
    the term /Reality/ and how I apprehend them and how I (think) they
    relate to the business of "chatting with LLMs" and the
    implications for the discussion at-hand.    Maybe there will
    (co)arise a white paper elsewhere.

    However, to (try to) be concise I trimmed it a bit.   I think I
    hear us talking (effing) all the way around the question of
    whether there is an ineffable and is it just "mysticism" by
    another name?

    I hear DaveW holding Qualia as the only truly grounded Reality and
    EricS alluding to the way the Intersubjective dribbles over into
    Placeholder (a handwaving name for something we all think we know,
    but can't seem to pin down or agree on).  Most of us trained and
    operating in Sci/Eng/Tech *want* there to be a simple Objective
    which the formalisms of math/science help us converge upon but
    defer to Operational/Pragmatic most of the time?

    My suspicion of mystical rhetoric is that it is a most
    /obscurational/ form of Placeholder Reality... while also being
    *aspriational* ("but what IF there IS an objective reality which
    *only I* can access through unspecified occult means?").  That
    said, I DO agree with DaveWs suggestion that there are things
    which can be perceived, even apprehended which cannot be expressed
    ("effed").  thus they are "ineffable".  The arts of the Arcane and
    Occult attempt to "eff" them, though gesturally, pointing vaguely
    toward an interstice?   Alexander's QWAN, etc.

    My working definitions of "Reality" to be found at the bottom of
    the post.

    I acknowledge Qualia as fundamental to *my* existence.. but
    recognize the  Pragmatic as a common mode of my expression and
    even apprehension, all the while aspiring to Objective but
    deferring heavily to Intersubjective to interpret all of the
    others.     EAC is most interesting to me whether it is the
    autopoesis of M&V or the vedic/buddhist dependent co-arising, or
    wheeler/beyond quantum realities.   But maybe because it is more
    exotic?

    EricS wrote:

    On Jun 27, 2025, at 7:31, Marcus Daniels <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

    Dave writes:

    <My 'mysticism', like my hallucinogenic experience, is nothing
    more than a source of what I consider to be "real" data and a
    supply of fascinating questions—never answers.>

    Not clear why something that supposedly cannot be captured by
    mere language keeps getting pitched as a real and
    intersubjective thing via language.

    I am much less bothered by this _in principle_, since I generally
    hold the two premises:

    1. Language is a collection of signals _within_ a system,
    ...

    2. The term “reality” is a problem in general.
    I do like the idea that this is just a version of the normal
    confusion, for things not understood very well (like, quite
    badly), and that one could find ways to do better.

    Without belaboring (but including for completeness) I offer my
    working definitions of various uses of the term /*Reality*/:

    1) Operational Pragmatic Reality: /
    /

        /That which affords coherent behavior—the reliable background
        against which action can occur. As from ecological psychology
        (/Gibson/’s affordances), predictive processing (/Friston/),
        and some aspects of (our beloved) /Peircean/pragmatism?/

    2) Intersubjective Reality:

        /That which is constructed, maintained, and enacted through
        language and shared narratives.  As from /Luckman, Lacan,
        Foucault/?/

    3) Formal (Scientific) Reality:

        /That which can be modeled with precision, prediction, and
        repeatability.  As from Mathematics, physics, systems theory?/

    4) Experiential Reality: /
    /

        The immediately given, lived experience—the “suchness” before
        concept.**/As from /Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Varela?  Whence
        /Qualia/.

    5) Placeholder Reality:

        /The term “reality” as a placeholder or dummy variable—used
        rhetorically to defer deeper ontological commitments.  As from
        /all of us/all the time?/

    6) Participatory Reality:

        /Reality as not wholly determinate /until observed or
        enacted/—that is, it co-arises with participation./

    7) Linguistic Manifold Reality:

        /LLMs inhabit and approximate intersubjective reality.  Each
        language model represents a “manifold” within a semantic
        plenum. “Reality” is the high-dimensional attractor surface
        that forms when enough participants (biological or artificial)
        converge on something shareable, predictive, and compressible./

    Enactivism / Autopoiesis / Dependent Co-Arising (EAC) is not a
    single category in this typology—it is a *meta-theory of
    reality-generation*, operating across:

     *

        *Operational* → it explains the /conditions for affordances/

     *

        *Intersubjective* → it explains /how we co-construct the shared/

     *

        *Experiential* → it explains /how we inhabit the lived/

     *

        *Participatory* → it explains /why observation creates reality/

    And it gently critiques:

     *

        *Formal* → by showing its limits

     *

        *Placeholder* → by showing its necessity

     *

        *LLM-based* → by asking what is missing for full participation


    .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. ---
    -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
    https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
    to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:  5/2017 thru present
    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
      1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xD5BAF94F88AFFA63.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to