I'm not clear on your (EricS's) age (childhood) but I have a full bound collection of SciAm which might date back that far I'd love to find someone to take over from me... I already tried unloading them on Zingale but he ducked that bullet.

Any takers?   Old paper and dust?

> Eric writes
> When I was a kid, there was some article (maybe Sci. Am.?) that I found wonderful.

Bilateral Symmetry may apply to in magazines too :-) Here's a 1973 article in "American Scientist" instead of "Scientific American" :-)

https://www.americanscientist.org/article/how-the-owl-tracks-its-prey
from the article:
Asymmetrical placement of the ears (one higher than the other) allows the owl to determine both the azimuth (horizontal direction) and elevation (vertical direction) of sounds.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 2:33 PM Santafe <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Jul 15, 2025, at 2:41, glen <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > Now, I'm sensitive to the argument that all this falls under
    parallax, even radially symmetric body types and the 9 octopus
    ganglia. And bi- vision, hearing, etc. is a simple form of
    parallax: triangulation.

    When I was a kid, there was some article (maybe Sci. Am.?) that I
    found wonderful.

    It had to do with owl ear asymmetries, which are produced by tufts
    of stiff feathers at unequal positions in front of whatever
    feather-hood (or something) channels sound to the ear canals.

    Upshot of the articles was that owls need resolution in the
    vertical as well as the horizontal, from phase, intensity, and
    packet-arrival-time differences (including what acousticians term
    the “head-shaped transfer function”, as I learned some decades
    later working among the acousticians for a few years).

    Article claimed (I have no way to check without a dive to see what
    has been done since) that owls and people have about the same
    acuity in lateral position of a sound’s origin, if the sound has
    enough shape (so, not a clarinet) to cue from.  But people have
    terrible vertical acuity. For owls, the vertical acuity is
    ballpark-comparable to the lateral.


.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to