Contrasting the finite memory of local spacetime with the seemingly discontinuous behavioral transitions a dynamical system undergoes as it moves away from criticality suggests philosophical complications worth exploring. In what follows, the working premise is that the universe unfolds along a non‑Turing‑computable, Chaitin‑random process, and that any finite region of spacetime has only finite informational fidelity, subject to physical limits on storage and erasure.
While this does not denigrate the successes of objective scientific pursuits—those requiring the preemptive registration of well‑defined objects such as particles, waves, or distributions—it does invite equal attention to the questions raised by Bekenstein, Kolmogorov, Chaitin, Per Martin‑Löf, and others about the information‑theoretic limits of spacetime and the possibility of incompressible informational drivers acting on a finite and dissipative spacetime. On this view, no bounded region can serve as a perfect, indefinitely faithful ledger of its own local history; at best, it carries a finite, coarse record, continually rewritten by ongoing dynamics. One idea to explore is that if an information‑dissipative universe is driven by a non‑Turing‑computable, algorithmically random process, then not only could we find ourselves in a universe that appears as ours does, but we would also find ourselves in a universe that is, at every moment, as actively and incompressibly specified as at any other. A "universal" model—say, near criticality—can characterize classes of possible behaviors and their scaling structure, but it cannot, even in principle, decide which exact Chaitin‑random continuation is being realized; identification of the singular sequence underlying "our" unfolding is formally undecidable. Another consequence concerns the ontological status and recoverability of the past. If we belong to an information‑productive and dissipative universe with only finite local fidelity, then the past not only disappears from the present in the naive sense, but the detailed evidential trace of past micro‑events is not guaranteed to persist within any bounded region. Finite information capacity and the thermodynamic cost of erasure imply that, over time, records are overwritten or degraded, so that only a coarse pattern of correlations remains available for reconstruction, and even these correlations are ultimately irrecoverable from the truncated "spacetime memory". I suppose this is a long winded way of saying that the fidelity of a given medium may or may not faithfully support the data one consumes and hopes to build models/reconstructions from. For the sake of providing analogy, a couple images I have in mind are: 1. Tracking price fluctuations in a market for a given security (with its few decimal places) is unlikely to provide a sufficiently rich foundation for the complete reconstruction of the underlying price mechanism. 2. The noise floor of an instant photograph reveals more about the sensor, the grains, and chemistry of the film than about the target of the image itself. These examples illustrate the broader concern: finite, noisy media do not, in general, encode a complete, invertible history of the processes that shaped them. In a universe driven by an incompressible process and constrained by information‑theoretic limits, this becomes a structural feature rather than a mere practical nuisance. It seems reasonable, then, to ask how physical laws are encoded in spacetime, and whether they are just as much a side effect of renormalization and coarse‑graining as color is. Criticality can be viewed as the locus of genuinely universal structure, where many microscopically distinct systems share a single fixed point description, while symmetry breaking “chooses a singular,” re‑grounding the system in a particular contingent history that the universal theory does not uniquely fix. In such a setting, effective laws and apparent conservation principles look less like timeless global book‑keeping rules and more like emergent regularities that hold within specific regimes, supported by finite‑fidelity records rather than a perfect global archive. Practically, it seems scientifically productive to develop methodologies for measuring, or at least bounding, the dissipation and erasure rates implied by these physical limits. Doing so would help clarify how far reconstructions of the past, confidence in "laws", and appeals to universality can be pushed in a universe whose unfolding may be fundamentally non‑computable and whose memory is ultimately finite.
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-.. FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
