Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am for improving TeX output. However I think that the patch has > two problems: > > - AFAIK \frac is LaTeX only, so this will brake plain TeX output. > \over works both for LaTeX and plain TeX. Breaking plain TeX > is bad idea, so if we really want \frac in LaTeX we probably > should have special flag to trigger such transformations. > > - the patch above changes already generated operator, it is probably > better to generate '\sp' and '\frac' few lines earlier. Also, > change breaks test for '\over' in the following line. >
I think we should have TEXFORM as well as LATEXFORM, which can probably share some code by package calling TEXFORM from LATEXFORM. This should make intentions clear and should avoid further discussions. Martin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
