> Of course the problem is due to approximate nature of floating
> point numbers.  And we have Approximate for such purpose.
> But ATM:
>
> (11) -> Complex(Float) has Approximate
>
>    (11)  false
>
> We can build a lot of strange domains.  Expression(PrimeField(3))
> and similar are likely to show much breakage.

The documentation of Approximate says:
++ An approximation to the real numbers.

We should change that to "An approximation to numbers."
And for Complex(S): if S has Approximate then Approximate.

Is that OK?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to