oldk1331 wrote:
>
> Hmm,
>
> (1) -> monomial?(0::POLY INT)
>
> (1) true
> Type: Boolean
> (2) -> monomial?(0::SUP INT)
>
> (2) false
> Type: Boolean
>
> Is there a problem?
It seems that this is artifact due to implementation
in SMP. It looks that number of uses of 'monomial?' is very small.
Quite possible that the only use for version from SMP is
in 'manip.spad', where current result seem to be OK.
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
