On 2/21/20 4:53 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:19:45PM +0100, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >> Since we are at interpreter error messages. I get ... >> >> (210) -> onetnStep! ycomp >> >>>> System error: >> The function BOOT::|*1;onetnStep!;1;initial| is undefined. > > I consider this as interpreter bug. Interpreter is producing > specialized versions of functions on demand, but in some cases this > machinery fails. > >> It's hard to track this down. Maybe there is a generic solution to >> it that I don't know of. > > Write simpler code :(
;-) That's a cool hint. But hey, I love FriCAS, because I can write such parametrized code. Obviously, I shouldn't mix .spad code with .input code in such a way. > Unfortunatly interpreter is buggy and more complicated code is more > likely to find bugs. OK, that means that I should continue writing complicated code. ;-) > I have fixed a bunch of interpreter bugs, but may feeling is that to > make definite progress we need to rewrite it almost from scratch. > The diffeculty of rewrite is mostly that current interpreter also > have nice features and we would like to preserve them. Oh... if the Aldor compiler could help... Unfortunately, Peter is not eager to write such a thing. Currently, "aldor -gloop" is not really a replacement for the FriCAS interpreter. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/a3e3bdcd-fbc3-9ead-fcef-7086b5b78ab3%40hemmecke.org.
