Another example: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06747-5
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:56 AM Waldek Hebisch <de...@fricas.org> wrote: > … > One more thing: early in history of AI there was Eliza. > It was simple pattern matcher clearly having no inteligence, > yet it was able to fool some humans to belive that they > communicate with other human (ok, at least for some time). > Some people take this to consider all solved AI problems > as kind of fake and show that the problem was not about > inteligence. But IMO there is different possiblity: that > all our inteligence is "fake" in similar vein. In other > words, we do not solve general problem but use tricks which > happen to work in real life. Or to put it differently, > we may be much more limited than we imagine. Eliza clearly > shows that we can be easily fooled into assuming that > something has much more abilities than it really has > (and "something" may be really "we"). +1 I strongly agree with your point in parenthesis above. It seems to me that the current generation of AI tells us more about the actual capabilities of human beings and the nature of intelligence than it does about the limitations of computer systems. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/CAC6x94RH1y4a_-BtJVkEDFS2B-d65SUbesP%3Dx93g5bKwX8oMjA%40mail.gmail.com.
