The two functions Test_1() and Test_2() differ only in their
declarations. However the first one runs ok, while the second
fails and drops into the debug mode:
(1) -> )r test
Test_1() ==
A : INT := 1
B : INT := 2
C : INT := 3
output("")
output("A:", A)
output("B:", B)
output("C:", C)
output("")
Test_2() ==
(A, B, C) : INT := (1, 2, 3)
output("")
output("A:", A)
output("B:", B)
output("C:", C)
output("")
(3) -> Test_1()
Compiling function Test_1 with type () -> Void
A: 1
B: 2
C: 3
(4) -> Test_2()
Compiling function Test_2 with type () -> Void
debugger invoked on a SIMPLE-CONDITION in thread
#<THREAD "main thread" RUNNING {10004F05B3}>:
break
Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:EXIT) to exit from SBCL.
restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name):
0: [CONTINUE] Return from BREAK.
1: [ABORT ] Exit from the current thread.
(|compTran1| (LETT (|Tuple| A B C) (QUOTE UNINITIALIZED_VARIABLE) |Test_2|))
error finding frame source: Bogus form-number: the source file has
probably
changed too much to cope with.
source: NIL
0]
Thanks,
SWA
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/d3d3b0f7-3516-4842-b5c7-aee3c58978d6n%40googlegroups.com.
