Completely silly thing. I wonder how it comes from. +1
Le dim. 6 juil. 2025, 00:59, Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> a écrit : > Currently RecursivePolynomialCategory under some conditions declares > ConvertibleTo(String). This looks fishy. First, part of condition > is RetractableTo(Integer) and implementation uses retraction to > Integer. But in general retraction may fail, so this is too > weak condition. Second, AFAICS no other polynomial category > exports such operation and apparently it is used only to > implement some alternative debugging printouts. > > I am thinking about removing this export. > > -- > Waldek Hebisch > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/aGmuPMLmTRJsLd-O%40fricas.org > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/CAHnU2dZOg3tq6%2BxAztRup4Ks0wkRS89ucocX9i0s87QB-9f4MQ%40mail.gmail.com.
