W dniu 25 lipca 2011 23:45 użytkownik Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> napisał: > > On 7/25/11 3:34 PM, "Wols Lists" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 25/07/11 22:28, Jan Warchoł wrote: >>> I get it too... >>> I tried inserting random parentheses, but it didn't work. > > Random parentheses *never* work in Scheme; they only cause more problems. > > In C++ it's possible to add parentheses without causing problems; in Scheme > every time you add a parenthesis you create a new evaluation.
I know... I'm not Schematic enough. I just wanted to try anything, thought that maybe i'd save Wol some time by sheer luck :) >>> I've uploaded your new patch set to Rietveld >>> (http://codereview.appspot.com/4800051), hopefully it will help in >>> pinpointing the problem with Scheme syntax. >>> My apologies for delay! >>> >>> thanks for your work! >>> Janek >>> >> Thanks. >> >> As always, the problem is finding time, I'm planning to delete most of >> the code and put it back line by line - taking a sort of "divide and >> conquer" to try and work out what's wrong. I just need a bit of time >> when I don't have the wife and grandkids after me :-) > > Did my revised patch not get to you? It works. No, i didn't get it at all! I don't see it in frog archives neither. > Please don't try to go > through line-by-line! That would be a frustrating experience and a poor use > of your limited time. > > I've reattached the patch to this email. It should apply to master. It does and i see no errors, everything fine! Updated Rietveld. Thanks Carl, you are great as usual! Janek --- ---- Join the Frogs!
