Uproar in Gitxsan First Nation after support 
for Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline announced
By Mike Hager 
and Peter O’Neil, Vancouver SunDecember 4, 2011 
9:46 AM
Members of the Gitxsan First 
Nation were “in shock and embarrassed” after Enbridge Inc. announced Friday 
that 
aboriginal community had become an equity partner in its embattled Northern 
Gateway pipeline proposal.
Photograph by: Frank 
Wolf, Frank Wolf
Two chiefs of the Gitxsan First Nation say their 
nation was “in shock and embarrassed” after Enbridge Inc. announced Friday that 
aboriginal community had become an equity partner in its embattled Northern 
Gateway pipeline proposal.
Norman Stephens and Marjorie McRae say they have 
the support of most of the other 63 chiefs and the rest of the first nation in 
denouncing Friday’s agreement announced by Enbridge and Hereditary Chief Elmer 
Derrick. Friday’s deal was projected to bring at least $7 million to the 
community.
“The majority of the hereditary chiefs didn’t 
know that this nonsense was coming — we didn’t even know he was negotiating 
with 
them,” said Hereditary Chief Stephens, who goes by the traditional name 
Guuhadawk. “The hereditary chiefs did not know about it and are opposed to 
it.
“The claimed $7-million benefit shouldn’t even 
be a part of it because it goes nowhere to compensate the Gitxsan for any 
damage 
to our fishing stocks if there was a spill.”
Most of the hereditary chiefs heard of the 
announcement through the media as they were attending a funeral for a matriarch 
and hereditary chief Friday, which made the timing of the announcement 
disrespectful and in violation of Gitxsan law Stephens said.
Stephens said the majority of the hereditary 
chiefs are in opposition to the agreement, which he said was announced Friday 
as 
part of Enbridge’s PR strategy to counter Thursday’s coalition of 130 B.C. 
first 
nations groups that vowed to present an “unbroken wall” to block construction 
of 
the project.
Today, Enbridge spokesman Paul Stanway told The 
Sun there was no correlation between the two announcements and that it is 
confident Derrick speaks for the greater Gitxsan First Nation.
“We’ve done a lot of research and we think we 
understand the governance structure of the Gitxsan quite well and we’re 
comfortable with the way this has proceeded,” Stanway said. “We’re convinced 
we’re speaking to the right people.”
Derrick made Friday’s announcement while acting 
as the chief treaty negotiator for the nation. He could not be reached 
Saturday. 
On Friday Derrick said the Gitxsan gave the Enbridge proposal careful scrutiny 
before making a decision, including scientific work by the Gitxsan Watershed 
Authority to examine streams within Gitxsan territory that would be impacted. 
Stephens is part of a group of chiefs that are 
plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the B.C. Treaty Commission and the Gitxsan 
Treaty Society over problems with ongoing federal and provincial treaty 
negotiations.
Stephens said he and other chiefs will hold an 
emergency meeting on Monday and want Derrick removed from his negotiator 
position in the Gitxsan Treaty Society. 
“In [Derrick’s] announcement he said all 
hereditary chiefs are behind this,” Stephens said. “Yet he’s not producing any 
of those chiefs.” 
Meanwhile, Stanway said Enbridge has executed 
agreements with other first nations, though he wouldn’t name any.
“All I can tell you is it’s a considerable 
number and we’re confident that more first nations will enter into agreements 
with us,” Stanway said. 
The $5.5-billion Northern Gateway project’s 
route is south of the southern border of the Hazelton-based first nation’s 
33,000 square kilometres of territory. The line would pass by six streams that 
flow into Babine Lake, a vital resource to the Gitxsan.
The Northern Gateway pipeline would bring 
diluted bitumen 1,200 km from Alberta’s oilsands to B.C.’s pristine coast and 
on 
to Asia.
The Gitxsan were the first aboriginal group to 
publicly support the project, something which Stephens said embarrassed the 
Gitxsan in the eyes of neighbouring first nations who oppose the pipeline. 
The Gitxsan were not one of the 61 first nations 
communities who signed the Save the Fraser Declaration in public opposition to 
the pipeline.
In an exclusive interview with The Sun last week 
Enbridge’s CEO Pat Daniel boldly predicted in the interview that at least 30 of 
the 45 First Nations along the pipeline route from Bruderheim, near Edmonton, 
to 
Kitimat on the B.C. coast, will have deals with Enbridge by next 
June.
And he said he hopes all 45 will be onside by 
2013, when Enbridge hopes to get regulatory approval to start a project that is 
set to be completed by late 2017. 
A federal review panel is set to begin hearing 
from the public on the pipeline in January. 
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, meanwhile, once 
again defended the importance of Canada finding a way to get oilsands bitumen 
to 
Asian markets after the Obama administration’s decision to delay the Keystone 
XL 
pipeline to the U.S. 
“It is not in this country’s interests that we 
are a captive supplier of the United States of energy products, especially when 
we see some of the politics that are going on south of the border,” Harper told 
reporters. 
The Gitxsan in northwestern B.C. are one of the 
province’s most prominent aboriginal groups — due to its role in the landmark 
1997 Delgamuukw land claims decision in the Supreme Court of Canada — and has a 
population estimated by Enbridge at around 13,000. 
mha...@postmedia.com
http://www.twitter.com/MikePHager

Reply via email to