--- On Mon, 3/12/12, RDIABO <rdi...@rogers.com> wrote:

From: RDIABO <rdi...@rogers.com>
Subject: Fw: toronto star: Alberta, Ottawa, oil lobby formed secret committee
To: undisclosed-recipi...@yahoo.com
Received: Monday, March 12, 2012, 7:23 AM





FYI


 

From: martin lukacs 
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 7:03 AM
To: martonlukacs 
Subject: toronto star: Alberta, Ottawa, oil lobby formed secret 
committee
 

 
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1144579--alberta-ottawa-oil-lobby-formed-secret-committee

 

Alberta, Ottawa, oil lobby formed secret committee
Published On Mon Mar 12 2012



Martin LukacsSpecial to the Star




The 
federal and Alberta governments struck up a secret, high-level committee in 
early 2010 to coordinate the promotion of the oilsands with Canada’s most 
powerful industry lobby group, a document obtained through an access to 
information request reveals.
The 
committee brought together the president of the Canadian Association of 
Petroleum Producers (CAPP) with deputy ministers from Natural Resources, 
Environment Canada, Alberta Energy and Alberta Environment to synchronize their 
lobbying offensive in the face of mounting protest and looming international 
regulations targeting the Alberta crude.
Environmental 
organizations criticized the existence of a committee they said they were 
hearing about for the first time.
“I’m 
old-fashioned enough to believe that there should be a separation between oil 
and state, but with these types of secret committees it’s hard to see any 
daylight between them,” said Keith Stewart, a climate and energy campaigner 
with 
Greenpeace.
He 
said the federal government is working increasingly closer with oil companies 
as 
they attempt to polish the image of the “dirtiest oil on earth” and undermine 
climate-change policies in the United States and Europe that stand to curb the 
industry’s expansion.
“We’re 
seeing that the government is becoming the advocacy arm of the oil industry, 
whether that’s to kill environment regulations abroad or to rhetorically attack 
environmental groups and First Nations,” Stewart said.
“I 
think that most Canadians would agree that while oil may still run our cars for 
now, it shouldn’t ever run our government.”
CAPP 
spokesperson Travis Davies said the industry lobby group, which represents 150 
oil and gas companies, was invited to join the committee by the federal 
government.
“We 
exchange information on oilsands outreach activities,” Davies said. “For 
instance, when governors or groups wanted to come visit the oilsands, we needed 
to be at the table. It was about basic coordination.”
Davies 
said the committee has communicated about the work the industry lobby group did 
at its office in Washington and coordinated the “asks” they made during foreign 
outreach.
“It 
wasn’t about messaging. We could say, ‘have you talked to them? What work have 
you been doing?’ We want to make sure we don’t double up or duplicate our 
work.”
Though 
CAPP says oilsands development is expected to contribute $84 billion annually 
to 
the Canadian economy over the next 25 years, climate scientists say the 
oilsands 
must be drastically cut to prevent further global warming and dangerous changes 
in the planet’s ecosystems.
The 
Conservative government’s withdrawal in December from the Kyoto Protocol, the 
only globally binding agreement for emissions reductions, was widely criticized 
as a move to defend the industry and its plans for three-fold expansion.
“The 
fact that the Harper government and oil companies are conspiring behind closed 
doors is another indication the Alberta tarsands’ environmental costs, human 
rights violations and massive carbon emissions have become an international 
embarrassment,” said Clayton Thomas Muller, the oilsands campaign director for 
the Indigenous Environmental Network.
The 
“Oilsands Clean Energy Coordinating Committee” is mentioned in a January 2011 
briefing memo to Natural Resources deputy minister Serge Dupont.
The 
memo details talking points for a meeting with CAPP president Dave Collyer, 
including that the federal government aims to “ramp up” its lobbying in the 
United States and Europe over the next year and half.
A 
spokesperson for Natural Resources Canada said the committee meets 
occasionally, 
mostly by teleconference.
“Some 
referred to this group as an oilsands steering committee or a clean energy 
steering committee. However, there was never any formal mandate given to the 
group and the purpose is to informally share information,” the spokesperson 
said.
The 
spokesperson said that officials with Natural Resources Canada continue to meet 
with Alberta officials and industry representatives, though would not confirm 
if 
it was under this name or another.
According 
to government documents, the plans to establish such a committee appear to 
first 
have been discussed at a March 2010 meeting in Calgary involving high-ranking 
officials from CAPP, former PMO adviser Bruce Carson, CEOs from oil and gas 
companies and senior federal and Alberta government officials.
The 
group suggested forming a “federal-provincial-industry working group” or 
“Deputy 
Minister-CEO steering committee” to increase collaboration and “on-the-ground 
coordination.”
Lobbying 
by federal officials has helped delay a Fuel Quality Directive in Europe that 
would stick a dirty label on oilsands for causing more emissions than 
conventional oil, thereby discouraging its import for use as transportation 
fuel.
After 
an inconclusive vote last month, which environmentalists say was heavily swayed 
by Canadian pressure, European environment ministers will reconsider the Fuel 
Quality Directive in June.
The 
Harper government has threatened a trade war over the measure, which could set 
a 
global precedent and close off foreign markets to the Alberta crude.
Canadian 
and Alberta officials and industry groups have successfully lobbied against 
similar state-level fuel efficiency standards in the United States, but were 
dealt a blow when U.S. President Obama denied the Keystone XL pipeline, which 
producers were expecting to use to ship oil to the US Gulf Coast.
The 
wave of environmental protest has shifted focus to Enbridge’s Northern Gateway 
project, while the Harper government has characterized the opposition as 
“radicals” manipulated by foreign interests.
The 
revelation of the secret government-industry committee comes on the heels of an 
announcement that Environment Canada will try to “strengthen” cooperation with 
the oil sector by assigning a senior official to head up the newly formed 
Canadian Oil Sands Innovation Alliance, a partnership of a dozen major oilsands 
companies.

Reply via email to