But still, it is even more work to try and peice my system back together when it goes wrong. I'm just saying that it should be made safe for people to use.

On 18/03/06, VOROSKOI Andras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:40:17PM +0000, Alex Smith wrote:
> As some of you know, I've had a *lot* of problems with pacman over the past
> few days, because Arch broke it, and then we synchronized with upstream. I
> strongly recommend that in future, test *all* of Arch's code before even
> pushing it in darcs. By this, I don't just mean pactest, I mean test it for
> normal use on an installed system, be it a virtual machine, a chroot, or
> your main system. But I really would like to make sure that we don't *ever*
> have any system-wrecking problems in Pacman again

It's a lot of work to always test it. Anyway -current is for testing,
isn't it? If you want a stable sytem, use -stable!

--
voroskoi
_______________________________________________
Frugalware-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel

_______________________________________________
Frugalware-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel

Reply via email to