On Fri Feb 16, 2007 at 12:09:44 +0100, Gabriel C wrote: >VOROSKOI Andras wrote: >>On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:58:57PM +0100, Gabriel C wrote: >>>All the ROX packages are not maintained for a long time now ( and I >>>guess some are already broken ). >>IMO it's time to move ROX as we should not include it in 0.6 without >>m8r. >>I would also vote for removing of frugalpkg, frugalrledit, gtkpacman, >>guzuta, jacman and libpypac. >>Those are also broken imo. What do you think? > >I agree with all but frugalrledit :) frugalrledit does work for me. > >The foo_pacman_frontend are all broken and should go away. > >ROX maybe we move it or nobuild it for 0.6 ?!
I think nobuild is enough. If someone wants to use or maintain it, we don't have to search for it in the darcs tree, just remove the nobuild. IMHO IroNiQ -- Member of Frugalware Developer Team Web: http://www.ironiq.hu LinuxCounter: #331532
pgpi6hu3U9mgI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
