Na Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:36:08PM +0200, Csaba Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
pisal(a):
> Nice job!

in fact, full of dirty hacks, but better than nothing ;)

> Given that you have already the tool for converting between them, it
> should be easy to set up a commit hook which immediately propagates
> changes from git to darcs. And this could be done also in the other
> direction (_not_ simultaneously :)). Hence you can change your mind any
> time about the master/slave roles.

the incremental convert (or how it is called), so when it uses darcs
pull --dry-run is still broken for large repos. i'm not sure why but it
simply misses some patches so the convert fails. using darcs changes
--xml (which is possible only if use convert the whole history at once)
this does not occur

the other issue is that we would like to swich to git primarily because
darcs is slow, now if we add such a hook then it'll be even slow :)

of course if we change our mind we can still convert the repo back or
so, but i don't think this will ever happen

ah and wanted to show the diffstat between darcs and git:

$ diffstat foo.diff
 source/devel/mono/rc.mono    |    9 ++---
 source/network/dhcp/rc.dhcpd |   52 ++++++++++------------------------
 t/deps-i686                  |   65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

so it seems there are differences but not serious - all of these hunks
must have missed or so, the darcs version is the correct one

VMiklos

-- 
developer of Frugalware Linux - http://frugalware.org

Attachment: pgpu0Uyrgaopw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Frugalware-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel

Reply via email to