On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 06:15:59PM -0500, James Buren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed that these two packages could be combined into one, since they > effectively come from the same source. crazy & priyank, I would like to 1) > add subpkg setup to effectively replace priyank's esetroot to eterm and 2) > remove esetroot, seeing as how this effectively would deprecate it. If I > have your permission, I would gladly implement this for both of you. So, > what do you think?
Removing esetroot is a good idea imho; it's obviously outdated and unmaintained. Subpkg sound like a good idea as well. What about sending patches? It's easier to get an ACK in that case. ;-)
pgpNmF91xB99M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
