I would answer the same thing that devil505. Now the decision is yours. :-)
Devil505 a écrit : > > > 2009/1/11 Miklos Vajna <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Looks good, but wouldn't it be better to name the gimp part as > $pkgname-gimp as well? We try to name our packages after upstream > (except uppercase letters) and subpackages as $pkgname-foo. > > > FYI other gimp related packages in current have this name type: > gimp-$pkgname > http://frugalware.org/packages/14170 > http://frugalware.org/packages/49883 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Frugalware-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
begin:vcard fn;quoted-printable:C=C3=A9drick Hannier n;quoted-printable:Hannier;C=C3=A9drick email;internet:[email protected] tel;home:0241741932 tel;cell:0623151534 version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
