On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 09:50:18PM +0100, Fox <[email protected]> wrote: > I try to update FPC to 2.2.2 but I don't know if it is very good. I had > just changed the version and the sha1sum. Can you take a look ?
Blah, blah. :) Next time you could just put the log out to http://frugalware.org/~gholafox, sending messages bigger than 500KB needs manual approval and I hate to do it. ;) Also, if you touch a package, please send a diff, not the whole FB, it really makes it easier to see what did you change. > But, I don't understand why the last version is optimized and not that > one. :-( > > I know that package is under krix's hand but, I saw a good file manager > which require this version of fpc. So, I tried to update the last > version :) Taking over orphaned packages is appreciated in general. Given that the old version does not even build for me, I think you are safe to bump, even if the new version is not optimized. I had a look at the source, but given the FPC's majority is written in pascal itself, I don't think it's trivial to optimize the build. Just don't forget the remove the '# optimization OK' comment.
pgp8RnQ9dMMcU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
