On 27 May 2010 14:33, Devil505 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Russell Dickenson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 27 May 2010 07:18, Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Devil505 >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Opinions ? :) >>> >>> First, compressing an already compressed image is a bad idea. ;) (We >>> typically want "deeplink" when we review wallpapers, not zip files.) >>> >>> But to say something more constructive, I think it would be nice to use >>> the logo we have in the rules file, as long as this isn't extremely hard >>> for an artist, I would not give up this rule. >> >> I agree with both of VMiklos' points. >> >> For those who are wanting to review submitted or proposed wallpapers, >> a direct link is more easily accessible. >> >> Regarding the logo, I agree that it ought to be the official logo. We >> have had numerous people propose new logos but decided to stay with >> the current one. The official logo is easily available and I expect it >> wouldn't be too hard for the artist to apply it instead of the one >> they have used. >> > > Thanks for your answers. > > Finally he made a wallpaper with the official logo: > http://db.tt/zkC0Y7 > > I add this contribution for the next wallpaper contest :)
Devil505, Is the wiki artwork page for 1.3 still the best source of current information about the artwork's progress? May you always be Frugal, Russell Dickenson (AKA phayz) _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
