2011/3/7 Miklos Vajna <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:24:19PM +0000, Ananda Samaddar > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Nope - at the moment we just store SHA1 of the packages, to avoid >> > accidental corruptions. Patches are welcome to improve that in >> > pacman-g2, it would not be too hard to use gpgv for this, if one needs >> > it. >> >> That's a real shame, the Arch Wiki says that you use a version of >> pacman that does support package signing. I'm afraid that this is the >> main reason I want to switch from Arch. Their security is not very >> good. > > Please ask them to correct the info, then. Misleading anybody would be > bad, indeed. > >> Unfortunately I am not a developer, just an 'advanced user' so I >> wouldn't be able to code anything myself. > > TBH, While being able to fix issues yourself is nice, in most cases a > packager's life is more about building and testing than coding. > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > Frugalware-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel > >
Vmiklos, maybe some of theses questions and answers could be placed on http://frugalware.org/about -- Devil505 http://frugalware.org/~devil505/blog _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
