Regards,
Anthony Le 25 mai 2015 à 20:32, Marius Cirsta <[email protected]> a écrit : > I do understand your point but we have enough closed source as it is > and enough truly free and open source packages to maintain. While this > packages si open source it's only useful together with some closed > source stuff. We have VBox, qemu, docker as alternatives. > > As soon as VmWare open sources at least some of their stuff I'll > gladly maintain this and the open source VmWare but till then and > unless some cares about these they're out. > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 06:06:36PM +0300, Marius Cirsta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Well since vmware is closed source and there are lots of open source >>> alternatives I'd say no.... unless someone really cares about it. >>> >>> Ryuo has a point that we need to reduce the maintenance burden and >>> removing stuff like this is the way to do it. >> >> Hmm... OK. While I love libvirt and all the tools provided around it, I >> had the impression that the industry standard virt. technology is still >> VMWare on x86, so having Frugalware working on that out of the box (if >> all we have to do is to package the open source guest tools they >> provide) is worth having. >> >> But sure, if the removal really hurts, and someone steps up doing the >> work, then it can be always restored from git, so it's not a big deal. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Frugalware-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel > _______________________________________________ > Frugalware-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
