Hi all, I re-stumbled upon what I think does the worst disservice to both Debian and the FSF. The company I work for enabled nonfree on some machines solely for the purposes of getting GNU Emacs documentation. I'm guessing many other have done this as well.
I do not believe the Wikipedia modifications to the license have any effect on this [1]. I would argue that the attribution clause (in CC-Attribution-ShareAlike and the like) and the FSF website should have the affect desired, in spreading the core principles of free software, etc. Thoughts? Bryan Relevant pages: [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3-faq.html http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeTrackingSystem/SourcePackage/emacs22-non-dfsg _______________________________________________ Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
