Op 03-08-12 18:13, Jason Self schreef: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor said: > >> Debian Social Contract > > I'm reminded of what Stefano Zacchiroli said when he started this, that Debian > already asserts a clear separation already. > > I also think of what the FSF has published [2], that it's "not thoroughly > separated" to them.
I agree with the FSF when they say: "Debian also provides a repository of nonfree software". And even with my idea they could say: "Debian still has a repository of nonfree software", and they have a point then. What I want is to make some steps in the good direction: no non-free software from the debian.org repositories. >> two sets of infrastructure maintained > > I wonder if it needs to go that far? Apache has supported virtual hosts for a > long time. True. > Is there an opportunity to make the separation between what "is" and "is not" > Debian even clearer, and to do it in a way that remains consistent with > Debian's > social contract? I think my idea would make it clearer. But not 100% sure it's worth the work. Maybe there are other things more important. With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen http://www.vandervlis.nl _______________________________________________ Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
