On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 12:02 +0100, Kevin Donnelly wrote: > Are you seriously suggesting > that a committee just does what it likes, without telling anyone else what is > going on, providing a note of record, etc? And you have a very odd notion of > government procedures if you think that is what happens there, any other > impressions to the contrary.
I thnk we are getting the usual E-mail discussion polarisation here. If its not one thing it must therefore be the most extreme opposite. In principle significant decisions should be minuted at an appropriate meeting. In some circumstances this will happen after the event. There will always be potential for disagreement over what constitutes a significant decision. Hopefully we will all survive the internal politics long enough to make some sort of contribution to the free software movement ;-) Regards, -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMSL _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
