[EMAIL PROTECTED] asked: > What is your suggested licencing strategy? flickr does not allow images to be > licenced under the GNU FDL IIRC but the Creative Commons BY/SA/NC/ND licences > are available. BY-NC-ND would allow free circulation of the images, or BY-SA > would approximate the Four Freedoms.
I suggest a MIT/Expat-style licence, or allowing any use normally restricted by copyright (aka PD-style). CC-BY may be good after v3, but v2 has problems. [...] > > [www.freesklyarov.org] Adobe corporation. It seems rather stupid to let > > Defective by Design be used to promote a DRM controller. Is the > > campaign at least making some money from those adverts? > > Does Flash include DRM? I know that PDF and Shockwave do, but I was not > aware of any DRM in Flash itself. I do not know whether Flash includes DRM, but it is produced by DRM controller Adobe. > Can you suggest how the site can be made to work with a Free implementation of > Flash? Others know Free Flash better than I do. Last I saw was http://web.archive.org/web/20050205034327/http://www.affs.org.uk/~alex/HowDoWeReplaceFlash which seems to have been removed from www.affs.org.uk since. Anyone know where that info lives now? > Failing that can you provide or suggest an alternative image host that > does not use Flash and that understands non-ARR licencing? There used to be something in free.fr but I can't find it any more. Some Indymedia sites allow free software licensing of material (Bristol lets you specify it, but requires at least free for non-commercial). Self-hosting is also fairly simple using things like spgm. Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
