On Tuesday 03 March 2009 12:19, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> If things continue, I see John being incapable of progressing because he
> lacks the pragmatism required, instead he'll continue to insist on
> answers that no one else is interested in, and will alienate futher any
> of those that could help him
To be fair to John, whatever might be said about his modus operandi, he's not
*personally* looking for help ("him") - it's a bit wider than that. He asked
a reasonable question about where his money had gone and how he could get it
back, and so far as I can see he hasn't got a full answer to that yet. The
issue about how the Committee handled the abeyance/demise/cryosleep of AFFS
is in fact a valid one, mainly because money is involved.
I think it would be a good idea for *everyone* (not just John, and let's face
it, some of the replies to him are a bit close to the knuckle, so it's not
surprising he sends a reply to them) to operate a self-denying ordinance on
further emails until Mark can get some information and John can do whatever
it is he is in the throes of doing with whoever is still a member (I don't
think I am). He obviously knows his way around the arcana of constitutional
procedure, so I'm sure he'll come up with something.
--
Pob hwyl / Best wishes
Kevin Donnelly
www.cymraeg.org.uk - Welsh-English autotranslator
www.klebran.org.uk - Gwirydd gramadeg rhydd i'r Gymraeg
www.eurfa.org.uk - Geiriadur rhydd i'r Gymraeg
_______________________________________________
Fsfe-uk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
