Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Chinner [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 7:05 AM
> To: Zhaolei
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix warning of "Usage: _is_block_dev dev"
> 
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 08:48:14PM +0800, Zhaolei wrote:
> > From: Zhao Lei <[email protected]>
> >
> > _is_block_dev() will show above warning when "$dev" is not exist.
> > It happened when user hadn't set $SCRATCH_DEV(optional) and check
> > $TEST_DEV.
> 
> _is_block_dev() is used in many places to check whether the block device 
> exists.
> i.e. I'd suggest that _is_block_dev() should return an empty string to 
> indicate
> it's not a block device rather than exit if a null. That means we don't have 
> to
> execute _is_block_dev() in a subshell (i.e. via `_is_block_dev ...`) to 
> prevent it
> from killing the script that runs it if the block device passed to it is null.
> 
> That means we don't have to add checks everywhere it is called, and we can
> simplify the calling convention at the same time....
> 
Thanks for your suggestion.

Are you mean this?

diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
index 7449a1d..12861b8 100644
--- a/common/rc
+++ b/common/rc
@@ -951,8 +951,7 @@ _is_block_dev()
 {
     if [ $# -ne 1 ]
     then
-       echo "Usage: _is_block_dev dev" 1>&2
-       exit 1
+       return
     fi

     _dev=$1
@@ -1095,7 +1094,7 @@ _require_scratch_nocheck()
                fi
                ;;
        *)
-                if [ -z "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o "`_is_block_dev $SCRATCH_DEV`" = "" ]
+                if [ "`_is_block_dev $SCRATCH_DEV`" = "" ]
                 then
                     _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_DEV"
                 fi
@@ -1167,7 +1166,7 @@ _require_test()
                fi
                ;;
        *)
-                if [ -z "$TEST_DEV" -o "`_is_block_dev $TEST_DEV`" = "" ]
+                if [ "`_is_block_dev $TEST_DEV`" = "" ]
                 then
                     _notrun "this test requires a valid \$TEST_DEV"
                 Fi

It is clean than before, but we still need call _is_block_dev() in a subshell 
to get its return string.

If we want to avoid calling _is_block_dev in a subshell, we can do following 
change:

_is_block_dev()
{
    return 1 if "$1" is not block dev
}
_same_dev()
{
    return 1 if "$1" and "$2" are not same dev
}

And caller code will be:

if [ ! _is_block_dev "$SCRATCH_DEV" -o _same_dev "$SCRATCH_DEV" "$TEST_DEV" ]
then
    _notrun "this test requires a valid \$SCRATCH_DEV"
fi

Thanks
Zhaolei

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> [email protected]


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to